These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 22984099

  • 1. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O'Neill J, Noar JH.
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment.
    Grewal B, Lee RT, Zou L, Johal A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun 01; 39(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 27511915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM, Rutchakitprakarn L, Kuang SH, Wu TY.
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep 01; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun 01; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
    Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan 01; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG, Porto TS, Silva MB, Grehs RA, Pinto Ados S, Bhandi SH, Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, dos Santos-Pinto LA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov 01; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.
    Grünheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb 01; 145(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 24485729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.
    Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul 01; 124(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12867904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.