These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


219 related items for PubMed ID: 2300793

  • 1. [The border seal in restorations of class-V lesions with glass ionomer cement and composite (the sandwich filling)].
    Hänggi D, Hefti AF, Rateitschak KH.
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 2300793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D, Messer H.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Glass ionomer cement and "sandwich" restorations after two years of clinical service].
    Reich E.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Feb; 46(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 1814714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB, Swartz ML, Cochran MA, Phillips RW.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Feb; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH.
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D, Palamara JE, Messer HH, Burrow MF.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN, Ferrari M.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Experimental secondary caries around amalgam, composite and glass ionomer cement fillings in human teeth.
    Hotz PR.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Sep; 89(9):965-86. PubMed ID: 293928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.