These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 23009974

  • 1. Fear of litigation and cesarean section rates.
    Minkoff H.
    Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 23009974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure.
    Vimercati A, Greco P, Kardashi A, Rossi C, Loizzi V, Scioscia M, Loverro G.
    J Perinat Med; 2000 Oct; 28(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10875095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section.
    Schifrin BS, Cohen WR.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The impact of medical errors on physician behavior: evidence from malpractice litigation.
    Shurtz I.
    J Health Econ; 2013 Mar; 32(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 23328349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.
    Rock SM.
    Public Health Rep; 1988 Mar; 103(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 3140270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.
    Zwecker P, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA.
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 21249618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey.
    Küçük M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28891358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation?
    Fuglenes D, Oian P, Kristiansen IS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):48.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18973870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.
    Ryan K, Schnatz P, Greene J, Curry S.
    Conn Med; 2005 Mar; 69(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 15861999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.
    Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM.
    Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19169125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Obstetric litigation: effects on clinical practice.
    Symon A.
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2000 Feb; 40(3-4):165-71. PubMed ID: 11326163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Obstetrician perceptions of the causes of high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey.
    Küçük M.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 28387945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.
    Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T.
    J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Litigation in obstetrics: does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?
    Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Handler SJ, Tager IB, Hubbard AE, Caughey AB.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(16):1668-75. PubMed ID: 24460458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. ["Defensive medicine" in the choice of cesarean section].
    Vimercati A, Greco P, Loizzi V, Loverro G, Selvaggi L.
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000 Nov; 71 Suppl 1():717-21. PubMed ID: 11424835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
    Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC.
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar 16; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.
    Grant D, McInnes MM.
    Inquiry; 2004 Mar 16; 41(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 15449432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cesarean section rate: a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians.
    Applegate JA, Walhout MF.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Sep 16; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 1414429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates.
    Burrow S.
    Am J Bioeth; 2012 Sep 16; 12(7):44-52. PubMed ID: 22694036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Do tort reforms impact the incidence of birth by cesarean section? A reassessment.
    Cano-Urbina J, Montanera D.
    Int J Health Econ Manag; 2017 Mar 16; 17(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 28477295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.