These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

462 related items for PubMed ID: 23021114

  • 1. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI, Zaher AR.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament: a clinical study.
    Kumar KV, Umashankar K, Kumar DP, Kumar DP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov 01; 13(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 23404006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B.
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun 01; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan 01; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A, Júnior LG, Martins RP, Vianna AP.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep 01; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul 01; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS).
    Ikegami T, Wong RW, Hägg U, Lee W, Hibino K.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Jul 01; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y, Fukui H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec 01; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ, Jang GW, Chun YS, Moon YS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May 01; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H, Soleimani M, Golbar M, Dehghani Soltani A, Mirmalek SP.
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar 01; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Periodontal ligament distraction: esthetics and occlusal stability at the 2-year follow-up.
    Allgayer S, Rosenbach G, Tavares CA, Polido WD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr 01; 143(4):535-46. PubMed ID: 23561416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M, Shivaprakash G, Ramesh GC.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013 Apr 01; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Redefining orthodontic space closure: sequential repetitive loading of the periodontal ligament--a clinical study.
    Kalha AS, Kachiwala VA, Govardhan SN, McLaughlin RP, Khurshaid SZ.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Apr 01; 11(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20877730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Keng FY, Quick AN, Swain MV, Herbison P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb 01; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21415288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug 01; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage.
    Kim S, Herring S, Wang IC, Alcalde R, Mak V, Fu I, Huang G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb 01; 133(2):189.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18249283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction.
    de Assis Claro CA, Chagas RV, Neves AC, da Silva-Concílio LR.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Feb 01; 19(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24713566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov 01; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.