These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

318 related items for PubMed ID: 23021116

  • 1. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E, Greco M, Giordano D, Maiorana F, Leonardi R.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Sep; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M, Shahidi SH, Danaei SH.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Sep; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
    Tai B, Goonewardene MS, Murray K, Koong B, Islam SM.
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
    Naji P, Alsufyani NA, Lagravère MO.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G, Carey JP, Flores-Mir C, Secanell M, Hart A, Lagravère MO.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Athanasiou AE, Miethke R, Van Der Meij AJ.
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 10592154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G, Piancino MG, Bracco AA, Crincoli V, Debernardi CL, Bracco P.
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C, Paeng JY, Lee JS, Hong J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ruellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, Danesi C, Lione R, Nguyen T, McNamara JA, Cozza P, Franchi L, Cevidanes LH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A, Albarakati S, Baysal A, Uysal T, Kula K.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ, Dagab AM, Alle RS, Shenoyd U, Garla V.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013 May; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
    Neiva MB, Soares ÁC, Lisboa Cde O, Vilella Ode V, Motta AT.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.