These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

264 related items for PubMed ID: 23034110

  • 1. Aberrant first fixations when looking at inverted faces in various poses: the result of the centre-of-gravity effect?
    Hills PJ, Sullivan AJ, Pake JM.
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23034110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B, Tanaka JW.
    J Vis; 2013 Feb 18; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect.
    Laguesse R, Dormal G, Biervoye A, Kuefner D, Rossion B.
    J Vis; 2012 Sep 26; 12(10):14. PubMed ID: 23019119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Where and how infants look: the development of scan paths and fixations in face perception.
    Kato M, Konishi Y.
    Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb 26; 36(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23261787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H, Brady N.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May 26; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ, Radcliffe N, Cherkasova MV, Edelman J, Intriligator JM.
    Perception; 2006 May 26; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of eye movements over faces in photographic positives and negatives.
    Luria SM, Strauss MS.
    Perception; 2013 May 26; 42(11):1134-43. PubMed ID: 24601026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Abnormal fixation in individuals with age-related macular degeneration when viewing an image of a face.
    Seiple W, Rosen RB, Garcia PM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jan 26; 90(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 23238260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T, Viggiano MP.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep 26; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.