These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

325 related items for PubMed ID: 23039370

  • 1. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B, Atas A, Bayazıt YA, Goksu N, Gokdogan C, Tutar H.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.
    Atas A, Tutar H, Gunduz B, Bayazıt YA.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23400404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jan; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Vibrant soundbridge implantation of congenital atresia of oval window(with summary of nine cases].
    Wang DN, Zhao SQ, Li Y, Ma XB, Ren R, Chen XQ, Li YL.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr 20; 31(8):588-589. PubMed ID: 29871320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun 20; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A, Van Damme JP, Gilain C, Bihin B, Garin P.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb 20; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H, Schwab B, Hinze AL, Giere T, Lenarz T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun 20; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
    Linder T, Schlegel C, DeMin N, van der Westhuizen S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan 20; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun 20; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul 20; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for Vibrant Soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results.
    Bruschini L, Forli F, Giannarelli M, Bruschini P, Berrettini S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct 20; 30(7):950-5. PubMed ID: 19730149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M, Colletti L, Colletti V.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct 20; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Oct 20; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Middle ear implant in conductive and mixed congenital hearing loss in children.
    Roman S, Denoyelle F, Farinetti A, Garabedian EN, Triglia JM.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Dec 20; 76(12):1775-8. PubMed ID: 22985678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul 20; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.