These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 23039631

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.
    Chakraborty DP, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C.
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 23040503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G, Ferruzzi K, Pierotti L, Vianello Vos C, Berardi P, Bergamini C.
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of visual grading and free-response ROC analyses for assessment of image-processing algorithms in digital mammography.
    Zanca F, Van Ongeval C, Claus F, Jacobs J, Oyen R, Bosmans H.
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 85(1020):e1233-41. PubMed ID: 22844032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.
    Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Song T, Gur D.
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 18479482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
    Khurd P, Liu B, Gindi G.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
    Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.
    Bornefalk H, Hermansson AB.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
    Chakraborty DP, Winter LH.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
    Chakraborty DP, Yoon HJ.
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in free-response detection-localization tasks using ROC tools.
    Bandos AI, Obuchowski NA.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1808-1825. PubMed ID: 29921163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.
    Warren LM, Mackenzie A, Cooke J, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Chakraborty DP, Dance DR, Bosmans H, Young KC.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3202-13. PubMed ID: 22755704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.