These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
247 related items for PubMed ID: 23040085
1. DNA-binding domains of plant-specific transcription factors: structure, function, and evolution. Yamasaki K, Kigawa T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S. Trends Plant Sci; 2013 May; 18(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 23040085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Structures and evolutionary origins of plant-specific transcription factor DNA-binding domains. Yamasaki K, Kigawa T, Inoue M, Watanabe S, Tateno M, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S. Plant Physiol Biochem; 2008 Mar; 46(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 18272381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. WRKY transcription factors: from DNA binding towards biological function. Ulker B, Somssich IE. Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2004 Oct; 7(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 15337090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. From endonucleases to transcription factors: evolution of the AP2 DNA binding domain in plants. Magnani E, Sjölander K, Hake S. Plant Cell; 2004 Sep; 16(9):2265-77. PubMed ID: 15319480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA binding by the plant-specific NAC transcription factors in crystal and solution: a firm link to WRKY and GCM transcription factors. Welner DH, Lindemose S, Grossmann JG, Møllegaard NE, Olsen AN, Helgstrand C, Skriver K, Lo Leggio L. Biochem J; 2012 Jun 15; 444(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 22455904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: structure, function and evolution. Scharf KD, Berberich T, Ebersberger I, Nover L. Biochim Biophys Acta; 2012 Feb 15; 1819(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 22033015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Solution structures of the trihelix DNA-binding domains of the wild-type and a phosphomimetic mutant of Arabidopsis GT-1: mechanism for an increase in DNA-binding affinity through phosphorylation. Nagata T, Niyada E, Fujimoto N, Nagasaki Y, Noto K, Miyanoiri Y, Murata J, Hiratsuka K, Katahira M. Proteins; 2010 Nov 01; 78(14):3033-47. PubMed ID: 20717979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed structural differences among WRKY domain-DNA interaction in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Pandey B, Grover A, Sharma P. BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb 12; 19(1):132. PubMed ID: 29433424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new family of plant transcription factors displays a novel ssDNA-binding surface. Desveaux D, Allard J, Brisson N, Sygusch J. Nat Struct Biol; 2002 Jul 12; 9(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 12080340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural variation affecting DNA backbone interactions underlies adaptation of B3 DNA binding domains to constraints imposed by protein architecture. Jia H, Suzuki M, McCarty DR. Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 May 21; 49(9):4989-5002. PubMed ID: 33872371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MADS-box transcription factors adopt alternative mechanisms for bending DNA. West AG, Sharrocks AD. J Mol Biol; 1999 Mar 12; 286(5):1311-23. PubMed ID: 10064699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. Martín-Trillo M, Cubas P. Trends Plant Sci; 2010 Jan 12; 15(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19963426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factor family: structure-function relationships and determinants of ANAC019 stress signalling. Jensen MK, Kjaersgaard T, Nielsen MM, Galberg P, Petersen K, O'Shea C, Skriver K. Biochem J; 2010 Feb 09; 426(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 19995345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]