These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

290 related items for PubMed ID: 2305061

  • 1. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, Costa-Greco MA, Harris KM, Cooperstein LA, Rockette HE.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, Britton CA, Campbell WL, Feist JH, Straub WH, Davis PL, Plunkett MB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK, Simons M, Huang HK, Chuang KS, Rahbar G, Kangarloo H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
    Herron JM, Bender TM, Campbell WL, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Gur D.
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.
    Straub WH, Gur D, Good WF, Campbell WL, Davis PL, Hecht ST, Skolnick ML, Thaete FL, Rosenthal MS, Sashin D.
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 1994411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG, Cook LT, McMillan JH, Rosenthal SJ, Dwyer SJ.
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Comparison of digital radiography and conventional X-ray in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule with receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Duan G, Chen WG, Wang JY, Huang XH, Wang Y, Lu W.
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 23(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 12810395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY, Cho KS, Song KS, Kim JH, Kim JG, Ha HK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.