These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


502 related items for PubMed ID: 23073074

  • 1. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ, Steiner GZ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ, De Blasio FM, De Pascalis V, Karamacoska D.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.
    Harper J, Malone SM, Bachman MD, Bernat EM.
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):712-22. PubMed ID: 26751830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ, Barry RJ, Gonsalvez CJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H, Li H, Yu D.
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan 01; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intrinsic EEG and task-related changes in EEG affect Go/NoGo task performance.
    Karamacoska D, Barry RJ, Steiner GZ, Coleman EP, Wilson EJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar 01; 125():17-28. PubMed ID: 29409782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP, Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug 01; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.