These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

241 related items for PubMed ID: 23075358

  • 1. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
    Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C).
    Demirkiran F, Yavuz E, Erenel H, Bese T, Arvas M, Sanioglu C.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 22766754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy.
    Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Ertas IE, Ozdemir IA, Ulker MM, Yildirim G, Ataser G, Sanci M.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 35(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 25423700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
    Leng X, Wang M, Zhang SL, Wang D, Cao W, Yang XH.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Is pipelle biopsy really adequate for diagnosing endometrial disease?
    Tanriverdi HA, Barut A, Gün BD, Kaya E.
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10(6):CR271-4. PubMed ID: 15173672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
    Liu H, Wang FL, Zhao YM, Yao YQ, Li YL.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 35(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 25549755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M, Majid MM.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015 Jun; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
    Rauf R, Shaheen A, Sadia S, Waqar F, Zafar S, Sultana S, Waseem S.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014 Jun; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Del Priore G, Williams R, Harbatkin CB, Wan LS, Mittal K, Yang GC.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S, Triratanachat S, Kankeow K, Limpaphayom KK.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of cytospat and pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
    Antoni J, Folch E, Costa J, Foradada CM, Cayuela E, Combalia N, Rué M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1997 Mar; 72(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9076423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette.
    Ben-Baruch G, Seidman DS, Schiff E, Moran O, Menczer J.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994 Mar; 37(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 8050731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
    Henig I, Chan P, Tredway DR, Maw GM, Gullett AJ, Cheatwood M.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
    Piatek S, Warzecha D, Kisielewski F, Szymusik I, Panek G, Wielgos M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
    Goldchmit R, Katz Z, Blickstein I, Caspi B, Dgani R.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 8414316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy.
    Stovall TG, Solomon SK, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 2915864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage.
    Xie B, Qian C, Yang B, Ning C, Yao X, Du Y, Shi Y, Luo X, Chen X.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 25(4):724-729. PubMed ID: 29223698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of dilatation & curettage and endometrial aspiration biopsy accuracy in patients treated with high-dose oral progestin plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer.
    Kim MK, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML, Yoon BS, Jun HS, Lee GH, Lee YH.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):470-3. PubMed ID: 23822890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vacuum curettage by the Vabrar method. A simple procedure for endometrial diagnosis.
    Einerth Y.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982 Sep; 61(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 7148413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.