These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 23078516

  • 1. Labour dystocia--risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour--a population-based cohort study.
    Sandström A, Cnattingius S, Wikström AK, Stephansson O.
    BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1648-56. PubMed ID: 23078516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies.
    Roman H, Goffinet F, Hulsey TF, Newman R, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 Dec; 87(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 18231883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjaerven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Åbyholm T, Vangen S.
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk of retained placenta in women previously delivered by caesarean section: a population-based cohort study.
    Belachew J, Cnattingius S, Mulic-Lutvica A, Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Wikström AK.
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 24044730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Apgar score and perinatal death after one previous caesarean delivery.
    Carlsson Wallin M, Ekström P, Marsál K, Källén K.
    BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1088-97. PubMed ID: 20497412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Can we predict shoulder dystocia?
    Revicky V, Mukhopadhyay S, Morris EP, Nieto JJ.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 21691767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pregnancy week at delivery and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a population study of 2,014,956 deliveries.
    Øverland EA, Vatten LJ, Eskild A.
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24020942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
    Sherrard A, Platt RW, Vallerand D, Usher RH, Zhang X, Kramer MS.
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
    Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Dykes AK.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009 Sep; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Non-elective caesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labour in relation to maternal body mass index.
    Cedergren MI.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Aug; 145(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 19525054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden.
    Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S.
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 17877673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ, ALSPAC Study Team.
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study.
    Brown SJ, Gartland D, Donath S, MacArthur C.
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21489125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study.
    Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ.
    BMJ; 2004 Feb 07; 328(7435):311. PubMed ID: 14724128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Caesarean section in nulliparous women of advanced maternal age has been reduced in Sweden and Norway since the 1970s: a register-based study.
    Waldenström U, Gottvall K, Rasmussen S.
    BJOG; 2012 Dec 07; 119(13):1591-6. PubMed ID: 23078602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.
    Kwee A, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Reuwer PJ, Bruinse HW.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May 07; 132(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16884843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predictors for caesarean delivery and neonatal admission after trial of labour in women with one previous lower segment caesarean scar.
    Tan PC, Subramaniam RN, Omar SZ.
    Singapore Med J; 2008 Mar 07; 49(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 18362998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Inter-institutional Variation in Use of Caesarean Delivery for Labour Dystocia.
    Riddell CA, Hutcheon JA, Strumpf EC, Abenhaim HA, Kaufman JS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov 07; 39(11):988-995. PubMed ID: 28916125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dystocia in labour - risk factors, management and outcome: a retrospective observational study in a Swedish setting.
    Selin L, Wallin G, Berg M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 Nov 07; 87(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 18231891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction.
    Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Kieler H, Stephansson O.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug 07; 89(8):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20636240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.