These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
149 related items for PubMed ID: 23080216
1. In vitro antibacterial activity of different self-etch adhesives. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Cepurnykh S, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Selan L, Imbriani M, Visai L. Int J Artif Organs; 2012 Oct; 35(10):847-53. PubMed ID: 23080216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives. Korkmaz Y, Ozalp M, Attar N. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov 01; 9(7):57-64. PubMed ID: 18997917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci. Esteves CM, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Reis AF, Rodrigues JA. Oper Dent; 2010 Nov 01; 35(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 20672730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans]. Zhang L, Yuan CY, Tian FC, Wang XY, Gao XJ. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb 18; 48(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 26885909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of antibacterial activity of simplified adhesive systems. Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RR. Am J Dent; 2002 Dec 18; 15(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 12693381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Peters MC. Dent Mater; 2006 Jun 18; 22(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 16198404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of MDPB-containing primer on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in simulated Class I restorations. Brambilla E, Ionescu A, Fadini L, Mazzoni A, Imazato S, Pashley D, Breschi L, Gagliani M. J Adhes Dent; 2013 Oct 18; 15(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 23534020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibacterial properties of five bonding agents. Brandt PD, Botha FS, de Wet FA. SADJ; 2008 Sep 18; 63(8):448-51. PubMed ID: 19055102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against cariogenic bacteria. Gondim JO, Duque C, Hebling J, Giro EM. J Dent; 2008 Apr 18; 36(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 18276056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesives. Hamouda IM, Al-Khodary AM, El Shami FM. J Adhes Dent; 2010 Feb 18; 12(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 20155228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity and duration of in-vitro antibacterial activity of different adhesives used in orthodontics. Passariello C, Sannino G, Petti S, Gigola P. Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Apr 18; 122(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 24621259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro antibacterial activity of adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans. Paradella TC, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. J Adhes Dent; 2009 Apr 18; 11(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19492710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antibacterial Effect and Tensile Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesive Resins with and without Methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium Bromide: An in vitro Study. Krishnamurthy M, Kumar VN, Leburu A, Dhanavel C, Selvendran KE, Praveen N. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr 01; 19(4):409-414. PubMed ID: 29728545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro study of the antibacterial properties and microbial colonization susceptibility of four self-etching adhesives used in orthodontics. Jacobo C, Torrella F, Bravo-González LA, Ortiz AJ, Vicente A. Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr 01; 36(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23720449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Antibacterial activity of different generation dentin-bonding systems. Başeren M, Yazici AR, Ozalp M, Dayangaç B. Quintessence Int; 2005 May 01; 36(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 15892530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of antibacterial agents to MMA-TBB dentin bonding systems--influence on tensile bond strength and antibacterial effect. Kudou Y, Obara K, Kawashima T, Kubota M, Abe S, Endo T, Komatsu M, Okuda R. Dent Mater J; 2000 Mar 01; 19(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 11219091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro bonding effectiveness of three different one-step self-etch adhesives with additional enamel etching. Batra C, Nagpal R, Tyagi SP, Singh UP, Manuja N. J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug 01; 5(3):226-36. PubMed ID: 23596010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Antibacterial activity of two adhesive systems using various microbiological methods. Türkün LS, Ateş M, Türkün M, Uzer E. J Adhes Dent; 2005 Aug 01; 7(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 16430013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. Kenshima S, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Filho LE. J Dent; 2006 Nov 01; 34(10):775-83. PubMed ID: 16621219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybridization quality in cervical cementum and superficial dentin using current adhesives. Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Dent Mater; 2008 May 01; 24(5):584-93. PubMed ID: 17681594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]