These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 23083565

  • 1. Positron emission mammography: better than magnetic resonance mammography?
    Schilling K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S139-41. PubMed ID: 23083565
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Whole-body MR or PET-CT?
    Schmidt GP.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S142-3. PubMed ID: 23083566
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?
    Thibault F, Balleyguier C, Tardivon A, Dromain C.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S162-4. PubMed ID: 23083575
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Structural, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of diagnostic imaging in breast recurrence: the breast after treatment.
    Cuccurullo V, Cascini GL, Mansi L.
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Dec; 57(4):322-31. PubMed ID: 24322789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproducibility of breast biopsy.
    Masood S.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S95-6. PubMed ID: 23083620
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What to do with B3 lesions at needle biopsy.
    Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Bazzocchi M.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S90-2. PubMed ID: 23083618
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Integrated quantitative DCE-MRI and DW-MRI to characterize breast lesions.
    Jena A, Taneja S, Mehta SB.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S64-5. PubMed ID: 23083607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Breast MR for intraductal masses.
    Harms SE, Harms DE, Pope K, Grear D, Smith-Foley S, Johnson K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S59-60. PubMed ID: 23083603
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Poultsidi A, Athanasiou E, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV.
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.