These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
407 related items for PubMed ID: 23092634
1. Clinical evaluation of stereopsis. Westheimer G. Vision Res; 2013 Sep 20; 90():38-42. PubMed ID: 23092634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test. Takai Y, Sato M, Tan R, Hirai T. Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep 20; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test. Holmes JM, Fawcett SL. Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan 20; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereogram design for testing local stereopsis. Westheimer G, McKee SP. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Jul 20; 19(7):802-9. PubMed ID: 7390727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts. Comas M, Castells X, Acosta ER, Tuñí J. Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun 20; 21(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16518364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Makino Y, Yano M. Vision Res; 2006 Jan 20; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment. Tidbury LP, Black RH, O'Connor AR. Strabismus; 2015 Jan 20; 23(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 26669421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests. Fawcett SL. J AAPOS; 2005 Dec 20; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Binocular vision in idiopathic macular foramen. Pre- and postoperative findings]. Eckardt U, Eckardt C. Ophthalmologe; 1995 Oct 20; 92(5):626-30. PubMed ID: 8750986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth. Tanabe S, Yasuoka S, Fujita I. J Vis; 2008 Mar 26; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereopsis testing without polarized glasses: a comparison study on five new stereoacuity tests. Hatch SW, Richman JE. J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Sep 26; 65(9):637-41. PubMed ID: 7963223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. Nature; 1997 Sep 18; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between visual impairment and patient-reported visual disability at different stages of cataract surgery. Acosta-Rojas ER, Comas M, Sala M, Castells X. Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2006 Oct 18; 13(5):299-307. PubMed ID: 17060108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia. Seki Y, Wakayama A, Takahashi R, Umebara I, Tanabe F, Abe K, Shimomura Y. Strabismus; 2017 Mar 18; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders. Fawcett SL, Birch EE. J AAPOS; 2003 Oct 18; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]