These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

260 related items for PubMed ID: 23095930

  • 1. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C, Richards SH, Hill JJ, Roberts MJ, Norman GR, Greco M, Taylor MR, Campbell JL.
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL, Richards SH, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A, Brearley S.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ, Campbell JL, Richards SH, Wright C.
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013 Jun; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.
    Campbell JL, Roberts M, Wright C, Hill J, Greco M, Taylor M, Richards S.
    BMJ; 2011 Oct 27; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires.
    Richards SH, Campbell JL, Walshaw E, Dickens A, Greco M.
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug 27; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P.
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec 27; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C, Campbell J, McGowan L, Roberts MJ, Jelley D, Chatterjee A.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr 27; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K, Wollersheim HC, Arah OA, Cruijsberg JK, Grol RP, Lombarts KM.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar 26; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice.
    Campbell J, Narayanan A, Burford B, Greco M.
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May 26; 21(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 20515545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ, Asprey A, Richards SH, Campbell JL.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May 26; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does the method of administration influence the UK GMC patient questionnaire ratings?
    Richards SH, Campbell JL, Dickens A.
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2011 Jan 26; 12(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21426616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development and validation of a trustworthy multisource feedback instrument to support nurse appraisals.
    Crossley JG.
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015 Jan 26; 35(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 26115108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multisource feedback as part of the Medical Board of Australia's Professional Performance Framework: outcomes from a preliminary study.
    Narayanan A, Farmer EA, Greco MJ.
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec 29; 18(1):323. PubMed ID: 30594157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM, Overeem K, Govaerts MJ, Verhoeven BH, van der Vleuten CP, Driessen EW.
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug 29; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.
    Vinod SK, Lonergan DM.
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun 29; 57(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 23721151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC, McAvoy P.
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep 29; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.
    Ferguson J, Wakeling J, Bowie P.
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Apr 11; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24725268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L, Parker-Swift J, Crossley J.
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug 11; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.