These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Amblyopic Suppression: Passive Attenuation, Enhanced Dichoptic Masking by the Fellow Eye or Reduced Dichoptic Masking by the Amblyopic Eye? Zhou J, Reynaud A, Yao Z, Liu R, Feng L, Zhou Y, Hess RF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Aug 01; 59(10):4190-4197. PubMed ID: 30128490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Transient improvements in fixational stability in strabismic amblyopes following bifoveal fixation and reduced interocular suppression. Raveendran RN, Babu RJ, Hess RF, Bobier WR. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar 01; 34(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 24495165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH, Meese TS. Vision Res; 2007 Nov 01; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Excitatory Contribution to Binocular Interactions in Human Visual Cortex Is Reduced in Strabismic Amblyopia. Hou 侯川 C, Tyson TL, Uner IJ, Nicholas SC, Verghese P. J Neurosci; 2021 Oct 13; 41(41):8632-8643. PubMed ID: 34433631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dichoptic Attentive Motion Tracking is Biased Toward the Nonamblyopic Eye in Strabismic Amblyopia. Chow A, Giaschi D, Thompson B. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Sep 04; 59(11):4572-4580. PubMed ID: 30242356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is Suppression Just Normal Dichoptic Masking? Suprathreshold Considerations. Reynaud A, Hess RF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Oct 01; 57(13):5107-5115. PubMed ID: 27699409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interocular suppression in amblyopia for global orientation processing. Zhou J, Huang PC, Hess RF. J Vis; 2013 Apr 22; 13(5):19. PubMed ID: 23608341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: masking effects of noise. Nordmann JP, Freeman RD, Casanova C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Sep 22; 33(10):2975-85. PubMed ID: 1526746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Second-order spatial summation in amblyopia. Wong EH, Levi DM. Vision Res; 2005 Oct 22; 45(21):2799-809. PubMed ID: 16023171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dichoptic Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Reflects Binocular Balance in Normal and Stereoanomalous Subjects. Barboni MTS, Maneschg OA, Németh J, Nagy ZZ, Vidnyánszky Z, Bankó ÉM. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Sep 01; 61(11):23. PubMed ID: 32931571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative measurement of interocular suppression in children with amblyopia. Narasimhan S, Harrison ER, Giaschi DE. Vision Res; 2012 Aug 01; 66():1-10. PubMed ID: 22750021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Baker DH, Meese TS, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov 01; 48(11):5332-8. PubMed ID: 17962490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophysics of suppression. Harrad R. Eye (Lond); 1996 Nov 01; 10 ( Pt 2)():270-3. PubMed ID: 8776459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interocular suppression in children with deprivation amblyopia. Hamm L, Chen Z, Li J, Black J, Dai S, Yuan J, Yu M, Thompson B. Vision Res; 2017 Apr 01; 133():112-120. PubMed ID: 28214552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]