These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

482 related items for PubMed ID: 23127058

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Overestimations in zero frequency DQE of x-ray imaging converters assessed by Monte Carlo techniques based on the study of energy impartation events.
    Liaparinos PF, Kandarakis IS.
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4440-50. PubMed ID: 21859045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF, Kandarakis IS.
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Acciavatti RJ, Maidment AD.
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6188. PubMed ID: 22047384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar 07; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH, Zhao W.
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov 07; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
    Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Golinelli P, Acchiappati D, Gallo E.
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov 07; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB, Simoni PU, Smilowitz L, Stanton M, Phillips W, Stewart A.
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov 07; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
    Arvanitis CD, Bohndiek SE, Blakesley J, Olivo A, Speller RD.
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan 21; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.
    Hajdok G, Yao J, Battista JJ, Cunningham IA.
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct 21; 33(10):3601-20. PubMed ID: 17089826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov 21; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.