These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 23135984

  • 1. Evaluation of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis in French Polynesia.
    Praud A, Gimenez O, Zanella G, Pozzi N, Antras V, Meyer L, Garin-Bastuji B.
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2013 Apr; 45(4):931-3. PubMed ID: 23135984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis.
    Praud A, Gimenez O, Zanella G, Dufour B, Pozzi N, Antras V, Meyer L, Garin-Bastuji B.
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 Apr 01; 104(1-2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22153032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of performance of selected serological tests for diagnosing brucellosis in pigs.
    Muñoz PM, Blasco JM, Engel B, de Miguel MJ, Marín CM, Dieste L, Mainar-Jaime RC.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2012 Apr 15; 146(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 22445082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of three serological tests for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in Pakistan by estimating sensitivity and specificity using Bayesian latent class analysis.
    Arif S, Heller J, Hernandez-Jover M, McGill DM, Thomson PC.
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan 01; 149():21-28. PubMed ID: 29290297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of indirect ELISA, Rose Bengal Test and Slow Agglutination Test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep and goats in Bangladesh.
    Rahman AK, Saegerman C, Berkvens D, Fretin D, Gani MO, Ershaduzzaman M, Ahmed MU, Emmanuel A.
    Prev Vet Med; 2013 Jun 01; 110(2):242-52. PubMed ID: 23276401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of serological tests for swine brucellosis in the presence of false positive serological reactions.
    Dieste-Pérez L, Blasco JM, de Miguel MJ, Moriyón I, Muñoz PM.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Apr 01; 111():57-63. PubMed ID: 25661496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Serological and molecular evidence of Brucella species in the rapidly growing pig sector in Kenya.
    Akoko J, Pelle R, Kivali V, Schelling E, Shirima G, Machuka EM, Mathew C, Fèvre EM, Kyallo V, Falzon LC, Lukambagire AS, Halliday JEB, Bonfoh B, Kazwala R, Ouma C.
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 May 11; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 32393374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development and evaluation of diagnostic tests for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis in swine.
    Di Febo T, Luciani M, Portanti O, Bonfini B, Lelli R, Tittarelli M.
    Vet Ital; 2012 May 11; 48(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 22718331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of three competitive ELISAs and a fluorescence polarisation assay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.
    Praud A, Durán-Ferrer M, Fretin D, Jaÿ M, O'Connor M, Stournara A, Tittarelli M, Travassos Dias I, Garin-Bastuji B.
    Vet J; 2016 Oct 11; 216():38-44. PubMed ID: 27687924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Serological and molecular analysis for brucellosis in selected swine herds from Southern India.
    Shome R, Kalleshamurthy T, Natesan K, Jayaprakash KR, Byrareddy K, Mohandoss N, Sahay S, Shome BR, Hiremath J, Rahman H, Barbuddhe SB.
    J Infect Public Health; 2019 Oct 11; 12(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 30448370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An evaluation of the capability of existing and novel serodiagnostic methods for porcine brucellosis to reduce false positive serological reactions.
    McGiven JA, Nicola A, Commander NJ, Duncombe L, Taylor AV, Villari S, Dainty A, Thirlwall R, Bouzelmat N, Perrett LL, Brew SD, Stack JA.
    Vet Microbiol; 2012 Dec 07; 160(3-4):378-86. PubMed ID: 22763172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
    Dieste-Pérez L, Blasco JM, De Miguel MJ, Marín CM, Barberán M, Conde-Álvarez R, Moriyón I, Muñoz PM.
    Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan 10; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bayesian estimation of the true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of the Rose Bengal and indirect ELISA tests in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.
    Sanogo M, Thys E, Achi YL, Fretin D, Michel P, Abatih E, Berkvens D, Saegerman C.
    Vet J; 2013 Jan 10; 195(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 22831991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an indirect ELISA kit for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams.
    Praud A, Champion JL, Corde Y, Drapeau A, Meyer L, Garin-Bastuji B.
    BMC Vet Res; 2012 Jul 09; 8():68. PubMed ID: 22640401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.