These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
369 related items for PubMed ID: 23140522
1. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults. Maclennan-Smith F, Swanepoel de W, Hall JW. Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Motakef S, Upson GS. Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry. Swanepoel de W, Biagio L. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test. Yu J, Ostevik A, Hodgetts B, Ho A. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD. Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry. Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC. Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]