These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

369 related items for PubMed ID: 23140522

  • 1. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F, Swanepoel de W, Hall JW.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Biagio L.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA, Hu N.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
    Swanepoel de W, Matthysen C, Eikelboom RH, Clark JL, Hall JW.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
    Sandström J, Swanepoel de W, Carel Myburgh H, Laurent C.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Apr; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N, Kei J, Driscoll C, Charles B, Khan A.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel de W, Eikelboom RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA, Parsa V, Lanthier N, Yoo J, Parnes LS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M, Swanepoel W, De Jager LB, Eikelboom RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.