These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
177 related items for PubMed ID: 23144506
21. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement. Wright AA, Delius JD. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence. Urcuioli PJ, Vasconcelos M. J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):341-58. PubMed ID: 18540219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons. Jitsumori M, Makino H. Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 15281387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Six-term transitive inference with pigeons: successive-pair training followed by mixed-pair training. Daniels CW, Laude JR, Zentall TR. J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 24318977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations. Lionello-DeNolf KM, Urcuioli PJ. J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 10784006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia). Nakamura T, Wright AA, Katz JS, Bodily KD, Sturz BR. J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 19236147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Pearce JM, Redhead ES, George DN. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons. Daniel TA, Wright AA, Katz JS. Anim Cogn; 2015 Jul; 18(4):831-7. PubMed ID: 25690508 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A differential outcomes effect using biologically neutral outcomes in delayed matching-to-sample with pigeons. Kelly R, Grant DS. Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 Feb; 54(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 11216302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Location as a feature in pigeons' recognition of visual objects. Lea SEG, de Filippo G, Meier C. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 35143244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes. Urcuioli PJ, Lionello-DeNolf K, Michalek S, Vasconcelos M. J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 16903494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Stimulus salience and asymmetric forgetting in the pigeon. Wixted JT, Gaitan SC. Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 15281389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives. Zentall TR, Hogan DE, Edwards CA, Hearst E. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jul; 6(3):278-99. PubMed ID: 7391753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus. Pearce JM, Adam J, Wilson PN, Darby RJ. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]