These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 23152219

  • 1. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov 14; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep 12; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
    Gurusamy KS, Toon CD, Allen VB, Davidson BR.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb 14; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
    Goto S, Sakamoto T, Ganeko R, Hida K, Furukawa TA, Sakai Y.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr 09; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003 Apr 09; (2):CD003577. PubMed ID: 12804476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM, Dow ML, Lohse CM, Tessmer-Tuck JA.
    BJOG; 2019 Mar 09; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov 03; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S, Grivell RM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul 22; 2014(7):CD004732. PubMed ID: 25048608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan 22; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May 22; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
    Poprzeczny AJ, Grivell RM, Louise J, Deussen AR, Dodd JM.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct 08; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 01; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.
    Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug 11; 2014(8):CD000163. PubMed ID: 25110856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct 11; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr 11; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul 11; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul 16; (3):CD004732. PubMed ID: 18646108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D, Feng L, Xu L, Li C, Zhang Q.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct 16; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J, Khalifeh A, Pettker C, Berghella V, Dabbish N, Mackeen AD.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov 16; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL, Ruiz MP, Kassar S, Tomassian C, Algren SD, Yeast JD.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov 16; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.