These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
411 related items for PubMed ID: 23167106
1. [Biomechanical research of less invasive stabilization system and dynamic condylar screw in fixing subtrochanteric fractures of femur]. Yang Y, Ma X, Ma J, Zhu S, Ma B, Ji S, Ma T, Chen Y. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 23167106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study]. Liang JY, Li KH, Liao QD, Zhu Y, Hu YH, Lei GH. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan 06; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive screw plates for surgery of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparative study. Ropars M, Mitton D, Skalli W. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct 06; 23(8):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18579266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Floyd JC, O'Toole RV, Stall A, Forward DP, Nabili M, Shillingburg D, Hsieh A, Nascone JW. J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct 06; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative biomechanical study of reversed less invasive stabilization system and proximal femoral nail antirotation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Chen Y, Liu S, Lin P, Wang Y, Wang J, Tao J, Cai R. Chin Med J (Engl); 2014 Oct 06; 127(23):4124-9. PubMed ID: 25430461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, de Oliveira AN, Sellenschloh K, Nüchtern J, Püschel K, Morlock M, Rueger JM, Lehmann W. J Trauma; 2011 Sep 06; 71(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 21768904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model. Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ, Lee MA. J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct 06; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical analysis of locking plate fixation with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in a subtrochanteric fracture model. Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Oh JK, Kim HJ, Min WK, Park SK, Park BC. J Trauma; 2011 Jan 06; 70(1):E19-23. PubMed ID: 20495493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur. Harris T, Ruth JT, Szivek J, Haywood B. J Trauma; 2003 May 06; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures. Otto RJ, Moed BR, Bledsoe JG. J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct 06; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Methods for Internal Fixation of Comminuted Subtrochanteric Fractures. Wang J, Ma JX, Jia HB, Chen Y, Yang Y, Ma XL. Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May 06; 95(19):e3382. PubMed ID: 27175636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stress test and clinical application of the minimal-invasive dynamic hip screw]. Tong SL, Chen JL, Lu WJ, Pan ZJ, Wang YJ. Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 May 06; 21(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 19108453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate. Krischak GD, Augat P, Beck A, Arand M, Baier B, Blakytny R, Gebhard F, Claes L. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Dec 06; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation. Beingessner D, Moon E, Barei D, Morshed S. J Trauma; 2011 Sep 06; 71(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 21610539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biomechanical comparative study on proximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 for treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture]. Jiang W, Liu Y, Yang L, Xu W, Liu S, Zhang D, Chen X, Wang H. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep 06; 28(9):1096-9. PubMed ID: 25509773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of four types of internal fixation in subtrochanteric fracture models. Wang J, Ma XL, Ma JX, Xing D, Yang Y, Zhu SW, Ma BY, Chen Y, Feng R, Jia HB, Yu JT. Orthop Surg; 2014 May 06; 6(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 24890295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw. Al-Munajjed AA, Hammer J, Mayr E, Nerlich M, Lenich A. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008 May 06; 133():1-10. PubMed ID: 18376008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]