These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
235 related items for PubMed ID: 23177084
21. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: current and emerging applications. Chou SH, Kicska GA, Pipavath SN, Reddy GP. Radiographics; 2014; 34(2):359-72. PubMed ID: 24617684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of the impact of digital tomosynthesis on the radiological investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography. Quaia E, Baratella E, Cernic S, Lorusso A, Casagrande F, Cioffi V, Cova MA. Eur Radiol; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1912-22. PubMed ID: 22538625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Asbestos-related pleural disease and asbestosis: a comparison of CT and chest radiography. Friedman AC, Fiel SB, Fisher MS, Radecki PD, Lev-Toaff AS, Caroline DF. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 3257311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of digital tomosynthesis in the context of tuberculosis contact investigation: comparisons with digital radiography. Mok J, Yeom JA, Nam SW, Yoo JM, Lee JW, Lee G, Kim KI, Jeong YJ. Acta Radiol; 2022 Jul; 63(7):901-908. PubMed ID: 34082579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Johnsson AA, Boijsen M, Flinck A, Kheddache S, Båth M. Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):1034-41. PubMed ID: 18849504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study. Kim EY, Bista AB, Kim T, Park SY, Park KJ, Kang DK, Sun JS. Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital Tomosynthesis versus Conventional Radiography for Evaluating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. Roh YH, Lee S, Ryu JA, Kim YJ, Kim Y, Bae J. Korean J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 22(12):2026-2033. PubMed ID: 34564962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Dec; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection. Szucs-Farkas Z, Schick A, Cullmann JL, Ebner L, Megyeri B, Vock P, Christe A. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Correlation of ultra-low dose chest CT findings with physiologic measures of asbestosis. Manners D, Wong P, Murray C, Teh J, Kwok YJ, de Klerk N, Alfonso H, Franklin P, Reid A, Musk AWB, Brims FJH. Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3485-3490. PubMed ID: 28083692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and computed tomography for lung nodule detection in SOS screening program. Grosso M, Priotto R, Ghirardo D, Talenti A, Roberto E, Bertolaccini L, Terzi A, Chauvie S, SOS Study Group. Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):568-574. PubMed ID: 28429205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]