These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

334 related items for PubMed ID: 23182690

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Point-of-Care 3-Dimensional-Printed Polyetheretherketone Customized Implants for Cranioplastic Surgery of Large Skull Defects.
    Pöppe JP, Spendel M, Griessenauer CJ, Gaggl A, Wurm W, Enzinger S.
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2024 Oct 01; 27(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 39283099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants.
    Gerbino G, Zavattero E, Zenga F, Bianchi FA, Garzino-Demo P, Berrone S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct 01; 43(8):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26242698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cranial reconstruction with prefabricated 3D implant after a gunshot injury: A case report.
    Malivuković A, Novaković N, Lepić M, Minić L, Stepić N, Đorđević B, Rasulić L.
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug 01; 73(8):783-7. PubMed ID: 29328616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
    Ng ZY, Nawaz I.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan 01; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing.
    Servadei F, Iaccarino C.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb 01; 83(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25153284
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
    Thien A, King NK, Ang BT, Wang E, Ng I.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb 01; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
    Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M, Kloss-Brandstätter A, Banki F, Robbenmenke C, Steinseifer U, Kessler P.
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr 10; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
    Jonkergouw J, van de Vijfeijken SE, Nout E, Theys T, Van de Casteele E, Folkersma H, Depauw PR, Becking AG.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep 10; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Utility of Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implants Adjacent to Sinus Cavities After Craniofacial Trauma.
    Suresh V, Anolik R, Powers D.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov 10; 76(11):2361-2369. PubMed ID: 29852139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.