These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 23184184
1. Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty. Thaler M, Hartmann S, Gstöttner M, Lechner R, Gabl M, Bach C. Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):759-65. PubMed ID: 23184184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions. Dong L, Tan MS, Yan QH, Yi P, Yang F, Tang XS, Hao QY. Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan 20; 128(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 25591562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions. Karaca S, Akpolat AO, Oztermeli A, Erdem MN, Aydogan M. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct 20; 50(5):544-547. PubMed ID: 27776930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical Footprint Anthropometry in Indian Population: Implications on Design of Artificial Disc Replacement Devices. Kulkarni AG, Patil VM, Bangalore SK, Saraf A. Asian Spine J; 2016 Feb 20; 10(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26949454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China. Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Pan S, Zhou F, Liu Z. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan 20; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant. Li Y, Fogel GR, Liao Z, Tyagi R, Zhang G, Liu W. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct 15; 42(20):E1173-E1181. PubMed ID: 28198781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul 15; 27(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28387616 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass. Jin YJ, Park SB, Kim MJ, Kim KJ, Kim HJ. Spine J; 2013 Apr 15; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep 01; 30(17):1949-54. PubMed ID: 16135984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Park JJ, Quirno M, Cunningham MR, Schwarzkopf R, Bendo JA, Spivak JM, Goldstein JA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr 15; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study. Zeng J, Liu H, Rong X, Wang B, Yang Y, Gao X, Wu T, Hong Y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug 07; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Kang H, Park P, La Marca F, Hollister SJ, Lin CY. Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun 07; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]