These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
187 related items for PubMed ID: 23215746
1. Comparison of Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: vascular complications and incidence of bleeding. Boudoulas KD, Pederzolli A, Saini U, Gumina RJ, Mazzaferri EL, Davis M, Bush CA, Capers Q, Magorien R, Pompili VJ. Acute Card Care; 2012 Dec; 14(4):120-4. PubMed ID: 23215746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients. Bhuiyan R, Bimal T, Fishbein J, Gandotra P, Selim S, Ong L, Gruberg L. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Javaid AI, Michalek JE, Gruslova AB, Hoskins SA, Ahsan CH, Feldman MD. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Kuno T, Takagi H, Ando T, Kodaira M, Numasawa Y, Fox J, Bangalore S. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr 01; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of overall bleeding in patients treated with intra-aortic balloon pump during percutaneous coronary intervention: 12-year Milan experience. Davidavicius G, Godino C, Shannon J, Takagi K, Bertoldi L, Mussardo M, Chieffo A, Arioli F, Ielasi A, Montorfano M, Latib A, Colombo A. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar 01; 5(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 22440503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis. Lansky AJ, Tirziu D, Moses JW, Pietras C, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW, Ekono MM, Grines CL, Parise H. Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec 15; 185():29-36. PubMed ID: 36210212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample. Dodoo SN, Kwapong YA, Agyemang-Sarpong A, Amoran E, Egolum UO, Ghasemzadeh N, Ramadan R, Henry G, Samady H. Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan 15; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz A, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor C, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR. JAMA; 2020 Feb 25; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results. Januszek R, Pawlik A, Rzeszutko Ł, Bartuś K, Bartuś S. Kardiol Pol; 2022 Feb 25; 80(12):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 36047958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5. Manzo-Silberman S, Fichet J, Mathonnet A, Varenne O, Ricome S, Chaib A, Zuber B, Spaulding C, Cariou A. Resuscitation; 2013 May 25; 84(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 23069592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Helgestad OKL, Josiassen J, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Holmvang L, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Berg Ravn H, Moller JE. Open Heart; 2020 Mar 05; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Vascular complications following intra-aortic balloon pump implantation: an updated review. de Jong MM, Lorusso R, Al Awami F, Matteuci F, Parise O, Lozekoot P, Bonacchi M, Maessen JG, Johnson DM, Gelsomino S. Perfusion; 2018 Mar 05; 33(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 28816093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock. Pieri M, Sorrentino T, Oppizzi M, Melisurgo G, Lembo R, Colombo A, Zangrillo A, Pappalardo F. J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec 05; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]