These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 23254724

  • 1. Sensitive skin: an overview.
    Inamadar AC, Palit A.
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2013; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23254724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sensitive skin: closing in on a physiological cause.
    Farage MA, Maibach HI.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Mar; 62(3):137-49. PubMed ID: 20565500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with environmental causes.
    Farage MA.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 18844698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Isothiazolinone preservative as important contact allergen in cosmetics.
    de Groot AC.
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1987 Oct; 35(5):169-73. PubMed ID: 3691316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Determination of suitable concentrations for patch testing of various fragrance materials. A summary of a group study conducted over a 6-year period. Mid-Japan Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    J Dermatol; 1984 Feb; 11(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 6376573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study.
    Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharrière O, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdain R, Bastien P, Wilkinson JD.
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 11531788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The roles of cosmetics and the production rate of skin surface lipids in facial dermatitis.
    Sun CC.
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1988 Mar; 87(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 3397731
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries.
    de Groot AC, Beverdam EG, Ayong CT, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP.
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Sep; 19(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 3191681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
    Tardiff RG, Hubner RP, Graves CG.
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003 Sep; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
    Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D.
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.