These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
257 related items for PubMed ID: 23261787
1. Where and how infants look: the development of scan paths and fixations in face perception. Kato M, Konishi Y. Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb; 36(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23261787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia. Schmalzl L, Palermo R, Green M, Brunsdon R, Coltheart M. Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jul; 25(5):704-29. PubMed ID: 18720102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual priming for upright and inverted faces in infants and adults. Webb SJ, Nelson CA. J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 May; 79(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11292308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Do infants recognize the Arcimboldo images as faces? Behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopic study. Kobayashi M, Otsuka Y, Nakato E, Kanazawa S, Yamaguchi MK, Kakigi R. J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jan; 111(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 21875715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information. Keyes H. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Jan; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of motion and audio-visual redundancy on upright and inverted face and feature preferences in 4-13-month old pre- and full-term NICU graduates. Kittler PM, Kim SY, Flory MJ, Phan HTT, Karmel BZ, Gardner JM. Infant Behav Dev; 2020 Aug; 60():101439. PubMed ID: 32438215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Face inversion and acquired prosopagnosia reduce the size of the perceptual field of view. Van Belle G, Lefèvre P, Rossion B. Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():403-8. PubMed ID: 25557618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors. Neiworth JJ, Hassett JM, Sylvester CJ. Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces. Liu L, Ioannides AA. Neuroimage; 2006 Jul 15; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study. Marzi T, Viggiano MP. Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep 15; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]