These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

495 related items for PubMed ID: 23273370

  • 1. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM.
    PLoS One; 2016 Nov; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
    de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N, Karsli E, Kurt G.
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD, Colville CD, Laman S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
    Cesur MG, Omurlu IK, Ozer T.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 29072243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J, Hey J, Fuhrmann R.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.