These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 23277394

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Exploring the eukaryotic diversity in rumen of Indian camel (Camelus dromedarius) using 18S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
    Mishra P, Tulsani NJ, Jakhesara SJ, Dafale NA, Patil NV, Purohit HJ, Koringa PG, Joshi CG.
    Arch Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 202(7):1861-1872. PubMed ID: 32448959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Functional and phylogenetic analyses of camel rumen microbiota associated with different lignocellulosic substrates.
    Gharechahi J, Sarikhan S, Han JL, Ding XZ, Salekdeh GH.
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2022 Jun 08; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 35676509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Understanding the alteration in rumen microbiome and CAZymes profile with diet and host through comparative metagenomic approach.
    Bohra V, Dafale NA, Purohit HJ.
    Arch Microbiol; 2019 Dec 08; 201(10):1385-1397. PubMed ID: 31338542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Molecular diversity of the foregut bacteria community in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).
    Samsudin AA, Evans PN, Wright AD, Al Jassim R.
    Environ Microbiol; 2011 Nov 08; 13(11):3024-35. PubMed ID: 21914099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.
    Xu B, Xu W, Li J, Dai L, Xiong C, Tang X, Yang Y, Mu Y, Zhou J, Ding J, Wu Q, Huang Z.
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar 12; 16(1):174. PubMed ID: 25887697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.
    Lamendella R, Domingo JW, Ghosh S, Martinson J, Oerther DB.
    BMC Microbiol; 2011 May 15; 11():103. PubMed ID: 21575148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic diversity of rumen microbial communities in Vechur and crossbred cattle of Kerala state, India.
    Sadan T, Aravindakshan TV, Radhika G, Anand LF, Ally K.
    J Appl Genet; 2020 May 15; 61(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 32006353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing.
    Ross EM, Moate PJ, Bath CR, Davidson SE, Sawbridge TI, Guthridge KM, Cocks BG, Hayes BJ.
    BMC Genet; 2012 Jul 02; 13():53. PubMed ID: 22747657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle.
    Li F, Hitch TCA, Chen Y, Creevey CJ, Guan LL.
    Microbiome; 2019 Jan 14; 7(1):6. PubMed ID: 30642389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.