These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

277 related items for PubMed ID: 23282282

  • 1. Detection of protein complexes from affinity purification/mass spectrometry data.
    Cai B, Wang H, Zheng H, Wang H.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. PubMed ID: 23282282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Integrating domain similarity to improve protein complexes identification in TAP-MS data.
    Cai B, Wang H, Zheng H, Wang H.
    Proteome Sci; 2013 Nov 07; 11(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 24565259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Markov clustering versus affinity propagation for the partitioning of protein interaction graphs.
    Vlasblom J, Wodak SJ.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar 30; 10():99. PubMed ID: 19331680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Identification of Protein Complexes from Tandem Affinity Purification/Mass Spectrometry Data via Biased Random Walk.
    Cai B, Wang H, Zheng H, Wang H.
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015 Mar 30; 12(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 26357231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computational detection of protein complexes in AP-MS experiments.
    Choi H.
    Proteomics; 2012 May 30; 12(10):1663-8. PubMed ID: 22711593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Scoring Large-Scale Affinity Purification Mass Spectrometry Datasets with MiST.
    Verschueren E, Von Dollen J, Cimermancic P, Gulbahce N, Sali A, Krogan NJ.
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar 09; 49():8.19.1-8.19.16. PubMed ID: 25754993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. ROCS: a reproducibility index and confidence score for interaction proteomics studies.
    Dazard JE, Saha S, Ewing RM.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun 08; 13():128. PubMed ID: 22682516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of protein complexes through model-based biclustering of label-free quantitative AP-MS data.
    Choi H, Kim S, Gingras AC, Nesvizhskii AI.
    Mol Syst Biol; 2010 Jun 22; 6():385. PubMed ID: 20571534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computational framework for analysis of prey-prey associations in interaction proteomics identifies novel human protein-protein interactions and networks.
    Saha S, Dazard JE, Xu H, Ewing RM.
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Sep 07; 11(9):4476-87. PubMed ID: 22845868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data.
    Tian B, Zhao C, Gu F, He Z.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Sep 21; 11(Suppl 4):82. PubMed ID: 28950876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X, Ivanic J, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep 21; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks.
    Brohée S, van Helden J.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov 06; 7():488. PubMed ID: 17087821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Network inference from AP-MS data: computational challenges and solutions.
    Teng B, Zhao C, Liu X, He Z.
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jul 06; 16(4):658-74. PubMed ID: 25378435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MCL-CAw: a refinement of MCL for detecting yeast complexes from weighted PPI networks by incorporating core-attachment structure.
    Srihari S, Ning K, Leong HW.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct 12; 11():504. PubMed ID: 20939868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Discovery of protein complexes with core-attachment structures from Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) data.
    Wu M, Li XL, Kwoh CK, Ng SK, Wong L.
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Sep 12; 19(9):1027-42. PubMed ID: 21777084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predicting overlapping protein complexes from weighted protein interaction graphs by gradually expanding dense neighborhoods.
    Dimitrakopoulos C, Theofilatos K, Pegkas A, Likothanassis S, Mavroudi S.
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jul 12; 71():62-9. PubMed ID: 27506132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Construction of co-complex score matrix for protein complex prediction from AP-MS data.
    Xie Z, Kwoh CK, Li XL, Wu M.
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul 01; 27(13):i159-66. PubMed ID: 21685066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A sampling framework for incorporating quantitative mass spectrometry data in protein interaction analysis.
    Tucker G, Loh PR, Berger B.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct 04; 14():299. PubMed ID: 24093595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computational and informatics strategies for identification of specific protein interaction partners in affinity purification mass spectrometry experiments.
    Nesvizhskii AI.
    Proteomics; 2012 May 04; 12(10):1639-55. PubMed ID: 22611043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A seed-extended algorithm for detecting protein complexes based on density and modularity with topological structure and GO annotations.
    Wang R, Wang C, Sun L, Liu G.
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Aug 07; 20(1):637. PubMed ID: 31390979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.