These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 23305528

  • 1. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
    van der Linde D, Rossi A, Yap SC, McGhie JS, van den Bosch AE, Kirschbaum SW, Russo B, van Dijk AP, Moelker A, Krestin GP, van Geuns RJ, Roos-Hesselink JW.
    Echocardiography; 2013 May; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Aortic Measurements in Patients with Aortopathy are Larger and More Reproducible by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Compared with Echocardiography.
    Nejatian A, Yu J, Geva T, White MT, Prakash A.
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 36(8):1761-73. PubMed ID: 26174757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, Gulati A, Roussin I, Alpendurada F, Park B, Okoroafor F, Asgar A, Barker S, Davies S, Prasad SK, Rubens M, Mohiaddin RH.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov 15; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E, Frick M, Meyer CG, Al Ateah G, Napp A, Kirschfink A, Almalla M, Lotfi S, Becker M, Herich L, Lehmacher W, Hoffmann R.
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun 01; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C, Bollache E, Kachenoura N, Perdrix L, Hrynchyshyn N, Bruguière E, Redheuil A, Diebold B, Mousseaux E.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep 01; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Ascending aorta dilatation rates in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic stenosis: the COFRASA/GENERAC study.
    Kerneis C, Pasi N, Arangalage D, Nguyen V, Mathieu T, Verdonk C, Codogno I, Ou P, Duval X, Tubiana S, Cimadevilla C, Vahanian A, Messika-Zeitoun D.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jul 01; 19(7):792-799. PubMed ID: 28950334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Rudolph A, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, Schulz-Menger J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May 01; 19(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 20583398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Datta S, Walls M, Nitinunu A, Van Houten T, Tomson NA, Vidmar L, Georgescu B, Wang Y, Srinivasan S, De Michelis N, Raman SV, Ryan T, Vannan MA.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jan 01; 25(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22105057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Transthoracic Echocardiography versus Computed Tomography for Ascending Aortic Measurements in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
    Park JY, Foley TA, Bonnichsen CR, Maurer MJ, Goergen KM, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M, Williamson EE, Michelena HI.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Jul 01; 30(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28501375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing imaging modalities for screening aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
    Tsai SF, Trivedi M, Daniels CJ.
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2012 Jul 01; 7(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 22691072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of proximal aortic diameter in hypertensive patients: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Leone D, Tosello F, Faletti R, Schivazappa G, Bruno G, Avenatti E, Ravera A, Veglio F, Milan A.
    J Hypertens; 2017 Aug 01; 35(8):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 28399041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Son JY, Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, Hwang HK, Lee SJ, Kang JW.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec 01; 27 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 22009020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F, Iacuzio L, Civaia F, Rusek S, Dommerc C, Hugues N, Alexandrescu C, Dor V, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus G.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov 01; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.
    Lee SC, Ko SM, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK, Hwang HK.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun 01; 28 Suppl 1():33-44. PubMed ID: 22592485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Ribeiro HB, Le Ven F, Larose E, Dahou A, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, Allende R, Amat-Santos I, Ricapito Mde L, Thébault C, Clavel MA, Delarochelliére R, Doyle D, Dumont E, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Rodés-Cabau J.
    Heart; 2014 Dec 01; 100(24):1924-32. PubMed ID: 25124218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, Krieger EV, Strugnell WE, Mitsumori L, D'Jang CL, Schwaegler RG, Nguyen KQ, Nguyen B, Maki JH, Otto CM.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan 01; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of congenital bicuspid aortic valves and associated aortic pathologies in adults.
    Wassmuth R, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Gruettner H, Utz W, Schulz-Menger J.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun 01; 15(6):673-9. PubMed ID: 24451178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
    Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Sechtem U.
    Heart; 2004 Aug 01; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr 28; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.
    Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Teixidó-Tura G, Galuppo V, Cuéllar H, Laynez A, Gutiérrez L, González-Alujas MT, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Sep 28; 29(9):819-826.e4. PubMed ID: 27288090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.