These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Three-dimensional assessment of the relative contribution of genetics and environment to various facial parameters with the twin method. Naini FB, Moss JP. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 15592212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Facial 3D Analysis With DNA Testing to Determine Zygosities of Twins. Vuollo V, Sidlauskas M, Sidlauskas A, Harila V, Salomskiene L, Zhurov A, Holmström L, Pirttiniemi P, Heikkinen T. Twin Res Hum Genet; 2015 Jun; 18(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 25869010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods. Kook MS, Jung S, Park HJ, Oh HK, Ryu SY, Cho JH, Lee JS, Yoon SJ, Kim MS, Shin HK. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphometric analysis of craniofacial features in mono- and dizygotic twins discordant for unilateral cleft lip and palate. Tessler AY, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Baccetti T. Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):878-83. PubMed ID: 21456957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera. Othman SA, Ahmad R, Mericant AF, Jamaludin M. Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal sex hormones, digit ratio, and face shape in adult males. Weinberg SM, Parsons TE, Raffensperger ZD, Marazita ML. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25257381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population. Talbert L, Kau CH, Christou T, Vlachos C, Souccar N. J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]