These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 23326989

  • 1. Comparison of the effectiveness in bacterial decontamination between chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone-iodine solution in foot and ankle: a pilot study.
    Rugpolmuang L, Thanabodeethada R, Riansuwan K.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Sep; 95 Suppl 9():S95-8. PubMed ID: 23326989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preoperative skin preparation of the foot and ankle: bristles and alcohol are better.
    Keblish DJ, Zurakowski D, Wilson MG, Chiodo CP.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 May; 87(5):986-92. PubMed ID: 15866960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preoperative footbaths reduce bacterial colonization of the foot.
    Ng AB, Adeyemo FO, Samarji R.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Sep; 30(9):860-4. PubMed ID: 19755070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Chlorhexidine provides superior skin decontamination in foot and ankle surgery: a prospective randomized study.
    Bibbo C, Patel DV, Gehrmann RM, Lin SS.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Sep; 438():204-8. PubMed ID: 16131892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery.
    Ostrander RV, Botte MJ, Brage ME.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 May; 87(5):980-5. PubMed ID: 15866959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of bacteria in forefoot surgery: a comparison of skin preparation techniques.
    Cheng K, Robertson H, St Mart JP, Leanord A, McLeod I.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Oct; 30(10):992-7. PubMed ID: 19796594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries.
    Srinivas A, Kaman L, Raj P, Gautam V, Dahiya D, Singh G, Singh R, Medhi B.
    Surg Today; 2015 Nov; 45(11):1378-84. PubMed ID: 25381486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department.
    Marlowe L, Mistry RD, Coffin S, Leckerman KH, McGowan KL, Dai D, Bell LM, Zaoutis T.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 20025532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yeung LL, Grewal S, Bullock A, Lai HH, Brandes SB.
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 23164373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.