These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
224 related items for PubMed ID: 23328404
1. The effects of aging on acoustic parameters of voice. Dehqan A, Scherer RC, Dashti G, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Fanaie S. Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(6):265-70. PubMed ID: 23328404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices. Dehqan A, Ansari H, Bakhtiar M. J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19230602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss. Dehqan A, Scherer RC. J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):e61-5. PubMed ID: 21236637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers. Mohseni R, Sandoughdar N. J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Normative voice data for younger and older adults. Goy H, Fernandes DN, Pichora-Fuller MK, van Lieshout P. J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):545-55. PubMed ID: 23769007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ageing voice: changes in fundamental frequency, waveform stability and spectrum. Decoster W, Debruyne F. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997 Sep; 51(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9241377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers. Demirhan E, Unsal EM, Yilmaz C, Ertan E. J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in acoustic and perceptual parameters of the voice between elderly and young women at habitual and high intensity. Mazzetto de Menezes KS, Master S, Guzman M, Bortnem C, Ramos LR. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2014 May; 65(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 24439013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian men and women aged between 18 and 45 years. Izadi F, Mohseni R, Daneshi A, Sandughdar N. J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 21889298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females. Franca MC. J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral analysis of the voice in Down Syndrome. Albertini G, Bonassi S, Dall'Armi V, Giachetti I, Giaquinto S, Mignano M. Res Dev Disabil; 2010 Sep; 31(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 20488659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of soft palate implants on acoustic characteristics of voice and articulation. Akpinar ME, Kocak I, Gurpinar B, Esen HE. J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 20434875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task. Brockmann M, Drinnan MJ, Storck C, Carding PN. J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Moderating Effect of Frequent Singing on Voice Aging. Lortie CL, Rivard J, Thibeault M, Tremblay P. J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):112.e1-112.e12. PubMed ID: 27049451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study. Aithal VU, Bellur R, John S, Varghese C, Guddattu V. Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012 Jan; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]