These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

716 related items for PubMed ID: 23331613

  • 1. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K.
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
    Honarvar Z, Zarisfi Z, Salari Sedigh S, Masoumi Shahrbabak M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A, Maeda MY, Erzen M, Branca M, Roteli-Martins C, Naud P, Derchain SF, Hammes L, Matos J, Gontijo R, Sarian LO, Lima TP, Tatti S, Syrjänen S, Syrjänen K.
    Acta Cytol; 2005 Aug; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P, Vuorma S, Viikki M, Hakama M, Anttila A.
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
    Laiwejpithaya S, Benjapibal M, Laiwejpithaya S, Wongtiraporn W, Sangkarat S, Rattanachaiyanont M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital.
    Khaengkhor P, Mairaing K, Suwannarurk K, Thaweekul Y, Poomtavorn Y, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21534360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
    Singh VB, Gupta N, Nijhawan R, Srinivasan R, Suri V, Rajwanshi A.
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P, Rash B, Martin A, Standaert B.
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A 1-year experience with liquid-based and conventional papanicolaou smear in Thammasat University Hospital.
    Suwannarurk K, Bhamarapravatana K, Thaweekul Y, Mairaing K, Poomtavorn Y, Pattaraarchachai J.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Dec; 94 Suppl 7():S47-51. PubMed ID: 22619906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.
    Strander B, Andersson-Ellström A, Milsom I, Rådberg T, Ryd W.
    Cancer; 2007 Oct 25; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
    Pankaj S, Nazneen S, Kumari S, Kumari A, Kumari A, Kumari J, Choudhary V, Kumar S.
    Indian J Cancer; 2018 Oct 25; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting.
    Hussein T, Desai M, Tomlinson A, Kitchener HC.
    BJOG; 2005 Nov 25; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
    Laiwejpithaya S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Benjapibal M, Khuakoonratt N, Boriboonhirunsarn D, Laiwejpithaya S, Sangkarat S, Wongtiraporn W.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008 Nov 25; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
    Budge M, Halford J, Haran M, Mein J, Wright G.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun 25; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
    Cox JT.
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov 25; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating cytology for the detection of invasive cervical cancer.
    Landy R, Castanon A, Hamilton W, Lim AW, Dudding N, Hollingworth A, Sasieni PD.
    Cytopathology; 2016 Jun 25; 27(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 26126636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The significance of augmented high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion detection on pap test examination: partial results from the RODEO study team.
    Scapulatempo C, Fregnani JH, Campacci N, Possati-Resende JC, Longatto-Filho A, Rodeo Study Team.
    Acta Cytol; 2013 Jun 25; 57(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 24135251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
    Pan QJ, Hu SY, Zhang X, Ci PW, Zhang WH, Guo HQ, Cao J, Zhao FH, Lytwyn A, Qiao YL.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep 25; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
    Sykes PH, Harker DY, Miller A, Whitehead M, Neal H, Wells JE, Peddie D.
    BJOG; 2008 Oct 25; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.