These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


728 related items for PubMed ID: 23334992

  • 1. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death.
    Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 23334992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of intrauterine fetal death in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: impact of including ultrasound biometry in customized models.
    Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Odibo L, Roehl K, Macones GA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 21538642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study.
    Kalafat E, Sebghati M, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A, Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK).
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 53(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 29660172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Association between small for gestational age and intrauterine fetal death: comparing a customized South Korean growth standard versus a population-based fetal growth chart.
    Moon M, Baek MJ, Ahn E, Odibo AO.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Mar; 29(6):872-4. PubMed ID: 25853216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancy complicated by small-for-gestational age: twin vs singleton reference charts.
    Briffa C, Di Fabrizio C, Kalafat E, Giorgione V, Bhate R, Huddy C, Richards J, Shetty S, Khalil A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 59(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 34405924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Twins versus singleton pregnancies: outcomes in small for gestational age late preterm deliveries.
    Walker AR, Waites BT, Caughey AB.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):895-900. PubMed ID: 30078342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chiossi G, Pedroza C, Costantine MM, Truong VTT, Gargano G, Saade GR.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing pregnancy outcomes and loss rates in elective twin pregnancy reduction with ongoing twin gestations in a large contemporary cohort.
    Vieira LA, Warren L, Pan S, Ferrara L, Stone JL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):253.e1-253.e8. PubMed ID: 30995460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Intrauterine growth characteristics of twins and those twins discordant birthweight].
    Han ZY, Fang Q, Luo YM, Hou HY, Chen ML, He ZM, Song HL.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 22883520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.