These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


249 related items for PubMed ID: 23356241

  • 1. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
    Huff MJ, Aschenbrenner AJ.
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ, Martens NJ, Bertoni AA, Sweeney EJ, Lividini MD.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Namias JM, Huff MJ, Smith A, Maxwell NP.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 34661459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
    McCabe DP, Presmanes AG, Robertson CL, Smith AD.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall.
    Tehan G.
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Dec; 64(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21186910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE, Gretz MR.
    Front Psychol; 2020 Dec; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mood and the DRM paradigm: An investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on false memory.
    Van Damme I.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1060-81. PubMed ID: 23057583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.
    Hege AC, Dodson CS.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 15238023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect.
    Storbeck J, Clore GL.
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):785-91. PubMed ID: 16181441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
    Ciaramelli E, Ghetti S, Frattarelli M, Làdavas E.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
    Hanczakowski M, Mazzoni G.
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effects of increasing semantic-associate list length on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false recognition memory: Dual false-memory process in retrieval from sub- and supraspan lists.
    Jou J, Arredondo ML, Li C, Escamilla EE, Zuniga R.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2076-2093. PubMed ID: 27606720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Negative affect promotes encoding of and memory for details at the expense of the gist: affect, encoding, and false memories.
    Storbeck J.
    Cogn Emot; 2013 Oct; 27(5):800-19. PubMed ID: 23134550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
    Butler KM, McDaniel MA, McCabe DP, Dornburg CC.
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity.
    Knott LM, Dewhurst SA, Howe ML.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):229-39. PubMed ID: 21875250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
    Miller MB, Guerin SA, Wolford GL.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1228-35. PubMed ID: 21767060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
    Burns DJ, Jenkins CL, Dean EE.
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.
    Guntre RW, Bodner GE, Azad T.
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17910191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.