These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Injuries registered by the patient's health insurance company: information to hospitals about malpractice for preventive measures]. Broström L. Lakartidningen; 1990 Apr 25; 87(17):1502-4. PubMed ID: 2338860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Swedish patient insurance scheme and guarantee insurance for prosthodontic treatment. Cronström R, René N, Owall B, Blomqvist A. Int Dent J; 1992 Apr 25; 42(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 1624199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Patients' complaints--many channels and poor oversight]. Bergsjø P. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May 30; 110(14):1854-7. PubMed ID: 2363155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding HIPAA: the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. McLellan TS. J Mich Dent Assoc; 2002 Mar 30; 84(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 11928581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The dentist's role in the insurance-legal claims process. Hoffman H. Dent Clin North Am; 1987 Apr 30; 31(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 3471583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Health insurance requirements create tension between two patient interests. Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Aug 30; 6(10):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [How to solve conflicts in connection with accidents in health care? Patient-physician relation in malpractice reports]. Lindberg B. Lakartidningen; 1995 Apr 26; 92(17):1815-8. PubMed ID: 7731327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of the professional medical liability insurance crisis: lessons from Missouri. Amon E, Winn HN. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun 26; 190(6):1534-8; discussion 1538-40. PubMed ID: 15284727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An insurance company's eye view of you. Raskin M. Dent Manage; 1979 Feb 26; 19(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 295778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care? Chupkovich PJ. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993 Feb 26; 9():337-75. PubMed ID: 10126943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court's decision adds little to antitrust analysis. Miles JJ. Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun 20; 9(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 10276709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is patient insurance something to count on?]. Olafsson O. Lakartidningen; 1997 Jun 18; 94(25):2354. PubMed ID: 9229648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experience with vascular surgery based on cases reported to the Patient Insurance Registry. Importance of circulatory control and competent methods]. Arnerlöv C. Lakartidningen; 1995 Apr 26; 92(17):1809-10. PubMed ID: 7731326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application of the Lex Maria. Obstructions and thresholds in connection with reporting of malpractice and errors in health care]. Lindqvist R, Grape O, Steen L. Lakartidningen; 1998 Jul 22; 95(30-31):3306-9. PubMed ID: 9715069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mutual responsibility in malpractice reporting is important]. Herner B. Lakartidningen; 1995 Jul 12; 92(28-29):2721. PubMed ID: 7637461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]