These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


126 related items for PubMed ID: 23373

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae to cefoxitin and BL-S786.
    Meyer RD.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Apr; 30(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 324961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Concept of class in relation to first-generation cephalosporins].
    De Toffoli A, Fantin B, Vechiet D.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Jun; 20(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6441962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Antibacterial activity of cefotaxim in comparison with seven cephalosporins].
    Braveny I, Dickert H, Machka K.
    Infection; 1979 Jun; 7(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 389804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Lysis if enterobacteria by cefoxitin, cefuroxime, and cephalothin.
    Goodwin CS, Hill JP.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Jan; 11(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 319751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of the variations in inoculum on the cephalosporins' in vitro antibacterial activity.
    Cafarelli A, Magliulo E, Piantieri G.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1981 Jan; 74(1-6):26-38. PubMed ID: 6458525
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of BL-S786 with cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin in vitro and in treatment of experimental infections in mice.
    Goering RV, Sanders CC, Sanders W.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Apr; 31(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 306989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [In vitro effects of cephalexin monohydrate on 1,398 bacterial isolations of various genuses].
    Gonzalez S, Hill JM, Luna M, Gutierrez M, Garcia M, Escarzaga Tapia E.
    Prensa Med Mex; 1970 Apr; ():11-5. PubMed ID: 4996099
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microbiological activity of cefazedone as compared to cefazolin and cephalothin.
    Knothe H.
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1979 Apr; 29(2a):378-81. PubMed ID: 39575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. ["In vitro" activity of cefamandole, cefalotin, cefoxitin and cefuroxim against enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus isolated in hospital (author's transl)].
    Thabaut A, Durosoir JL, Saliou P.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1979 Dec; 27(10):649-54. PubMed ID: 395496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Induction of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae by exposure to cephalothin and cefoxitin.
    Hoeprich PD, Huston AC.
    J Infect Dis; 1976 Jun; 133(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 778303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Microbiological evaluation of cefoxitin, a new beta-lactamase resistant cephamycin antibiotic, compared to cephalothin, cephaloridine and cefazolin].
    Schassan HH, Bentfeld G.
    Fortschr Med; 1978 Aug 10; 96(30):1510-7. PubMed ID: 669547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An in vivo comparison of cefoxitin, a semi-synthetic cephamycin, with cephalothin.
    Hamilton-Miller JM, Kerry DW, Brumfitt W.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1974 Jan 10; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 4843049
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.