These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

290 related items for PubMed ID: 23377063

  • 1. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants.
    Kennedy KS, Jones EM, Kim DG, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 23377063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.
    Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23527361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application and success of two stereolithographic surgical guide systems for implant placement with immediate loading.
    Abboud M, Wahl G, Calvo-Guirado JL, Orentlicher G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Apr; 27(3):634-43. PubMed ID: 22616058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
    Vieira DM, Sotto-Maior BS, Barros CA, Reis ES, Francischone CE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP, Dennhardt A, Schullian P, Reto B, Puelacher W.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Apr; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
    Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T, Camby E, Alik M, Isidori M, Bouchet H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, Ellingsen JE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Apr; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed using stereolithographic guided surgery: a prospective monocenter study.
    D'haese J, Vervaeke S, Verbanck N, De Bruyn H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 23377067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An in vivo study to assess and compare the angular, linear, and depth deviation as well as the difference in bone density of implants placed using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated three-dimensional guides versus the implants placed using bone pen kit in maxillary and mandibular ridges.
    Aggarwal S, Aggarwal S, Goswami R, Mowar A, Tomar N, Saxena D.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 Apr; 23(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 37929366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study.
    Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, Hassan B, Tahmaseb A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 31330566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
    Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, da Silva AM, Paschoal GH, Cury PR, Szarf G.
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
    Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months.
    Pozzi A, Sannino G, Barlattani A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Nov; 108(5):286-97. PubMed ID: 23107236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
    Pettersson A, Kero T, Söderberg R, Näsström K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.