These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


260 related items for PubMed ID: 23399376

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
    Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experience with the polymer-coated hydroxyapatite implant after enucleation in 126 patients.
    Shields CL, Uysal Y, Marr BP, Lally SE, Rodriques E, Kharod B, Shields JA.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 17270685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.
    Su GW, Yen MT.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 15266140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Anophthalmic socket in retinoblastoma: Exploring complications and risk factors in a tertiary centre in Malaysia.
    Ng LH, Chan LY, Mohamad NF, Rahmat JB.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 34(4):999-1008. PubMed ID: 38105429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of complication rates of porous anophthalmic orbital implants.
    Ramey N, Gupta D, Price K, Husain A, Richard M, Woodward J.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011 Jul; 42(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 21899247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve in bioceramic orbital implants.
    Liao SL, Shih MJ, Lin LL.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 139(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene implant in pediatric patients enucleated for retinoblastoma.
    Marx DP, Vagefi MR, Bearden WH, Anderson RL, Yen MT.
    Orbit; 2008 Feb; 27(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 19085293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of mersilene mesh for wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: mid-term result.
    Owji N, Mosallaei M, Taylor J.
    Orbit; 2012 Jun; 31(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 22551365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Safety of unwrapped spherical orbital implants.
    Perry JD, Tam RC.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 15266141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.