These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

627 related items for PubMed ID: 23403808

  • 1. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ, Andrus JN, Bance M, Phillips DP.
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears].
    Picard M, Couture-Metz F.
    Audiology; 1985 Feb; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of the 226-Hz probe level on contralateral acoustic stapedius reflex thresholds.
    Day JE, Feeney MP.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):1016-25. PubMed ID: 18658068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Dec; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA, Leek MR, Walden BE, Cord M.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Dec; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Re-examination of the role of the human acoustic stapedius reflex.
    Phillips DP, Stuart A, Carpenter M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 May; 111(5 Pt 1):2200-7. PubMed ID: 12051439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 May; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL, Festen JM, Goverts ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech intelligibility in stapedectomized individuals.
    Chadwell DL, Greenberg HJ.
    Am J Otol; 1979 Oct; 1(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 554471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W, Frey K, Heppelmann G, Plontke SK, Zenner HP.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of contralateral noise on speech detection and speech reception thresholds.
    Frank T, Karlovich RS.
    Audiology; 1975 Jan; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 1147844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jan; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE, Small SA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jan; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.