These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 23412405

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value.
    Sjödén GO, Movin T, Güntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H, Sperber A.
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Jun; 68(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9246984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison between two classifications of humeral head fractures: Neer and AO-ASIF.
    Gumina S, Giannicola G, Albino P, Passaretti D, Cinotti G, Postacchini F.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Dec; 77(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 22308619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation.
    Kristiansen B, Andersen UL, Olsen CA, Varmarken JE.
    Skeletal Radiol; 1988 Dec; 17(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 3238441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The reliability and reproducibility of the Neer classification system--digital radiography (PACS) improves agreement.
    Mahadeva D, Dias RG, Deshpande SV, Datta A, Dhillon SS, Simons AW.
    Injury; 2011 Apr; 42(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 20206348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns.
    Huflage H, Fieber T, Färber C, Knarr J, Veldhoen S, Jordan MC, Gilbert F, Bley TA, Meffert RH, Grunz JP, Schmalzl J.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar 01; 23(1):189. PubMed ID: 35232415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus.
    Siebenrock KA, Gerber C.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec 01; 75(12):1751-5. PubMed ID: 8258544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Surgeons agree more on treatment recommendations than on classification of proximal humeral fractures.
    Brorson S, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Sørensen AK, Krogsgaard M, Hróbjartsson A.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Jun 27; 13():114. PubMed ID: 22738149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience.
    Foroohar A, Tosti R, Richmond JM, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul 29; 6():38. PubMed ID: 21801370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reliability of Neer Versus AO Classification on Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.
    Stoddart M, Pearce O, Smith J, McCann P, Sheridan B, Al-Hourani K.
    Cureus; 2020 Jun 09; 12(6):e8520. PubMed ID: 32656034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review.
    Brorson S, Hróbjartsson A.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan 09; 61(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 18083458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification.
    Gicquel T, Najihi N, Vendeuvre T, Teyssedou S, Gayet LE, Huten D.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Nov 09; 99(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 24120208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A new morphological classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: validation and clinical implications.
    Mutch J, Laflamme GY, Hagemeister N, Cikes A, Rouleau DM.
    Bone Joint J; 2014 May 09; 96-B(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 24788500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Reproducibility of the Mayo and Schatzker classification systems in proximal ulna fractures.
    Carminati F, Obert L, Saade F, Bouteille C, Woussen E, Aouzal Z, Bourgeois M, Haight H, Regas I, Rochet S, Lepage D, Garbuio P, Loisel F.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 May 09; 110(3):103790. PubMed ID: 38070730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
    Taşkesen A, Demirkale İ, Okkaoğlu MC, Özdemir M, Bilgili MG, Altay M.
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec 09; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Greater Tuberosity Fractures: Does Fracture Assessment and Treatment Recommendation Vary Based on Imaging Modality?
    Janssen SJ, Hermanussen HH, Guitton TG, van den Bekerom MP, van Deurzen DF, Ring D.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May 09; 474(5):1257-65. PubMed ID: 26797912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A new classification of impacted proximal humerus fractures based on the morpho-volumetric evaluation of humeral head bone loss with a 3D model.
    Russo R, Guastafierro A, Rotonda GD, Viglione S, Ciccarelli M, Mortellaro M, Minopoli P, Fiorentino F, Pietroluongo LR.
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct 09; 29(10):e374-e385. PubMed ID: 32573449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.
    Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM.
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Aug 09; 72(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 11580125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.