These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

458 related items for PubMed ID: 23412754

  • 1. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F, Waseda K, Kume T, Otake H, Kawarada O, Yong CM, Fitzgerald PJ, Honda Y, Yeung AC, Fearon WF.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep 01; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC, Jayne JE, Garcia-Garcia HM, Swart M, van Es GA, Tijssen J, Kaplan AV.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug 01; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y, Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Wang W, Yamamoto H, Chamié D, Kanaya T, Mehanna E, Tahara S, Nakamura S, Costa MA.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep 01; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z, Tearney G, Bruining N, Sihan K, van Soest G, Ligthart J, van Domburg R, Bouma B, Regar E.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan 01; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J, Suzuki T, Uemura S, Yu B, Kozuma K, Kitabata H, Shinke T, Habara M, Saito Y, Hou J, Suzuki N, Zhang S.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct 01; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar 01; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, Généreux P, Nichols M, Jenkins P, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov 01; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
    Wang X, Matsumura M, Mintz GS, Lee T, Zhang W, Cao Y, Fujino A, Lin Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Maehara A.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug 01; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
    Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M, Kaneda H, Yokota D, Ko E, Ito T, Kurita T, Tanaka N, Kimura M, Ito T, Kinoshita Y, Tsuchikane E, Asakura K, Asakura Y, Katoh O, Suzuki T.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr 01; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kim SJ, Lee H, Kato K, Yonetsu T, Jang IK.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun 01; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC, Nam CW, Cho YK, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H, Chung IS, Han S, Hur SH, Kim YN, Kim KB.
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct 15; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intra- and interobserver reliability and intra-catheter reproducibility using frequency domain optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of morphometric stent parameters and qualitative assessment of stent strut coverage.
    Antonsen L, Thayssen P, Junker A, Veien KT, Hansen HS, Hansen KN, Hougaard M, Jensen LO.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec 15; 16(8):469-77. PubMed ID: 26475731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intra-stent tissue evaluation within bare metal and drug-eluting stents > 3 years since implantation in patients with mild to moderate neointimal proliferation using optical coherence tomography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
    Kitabata H, Loh JP, Pendyala LK, Omar A, Ota H, Minha S, Magalhaes MA, Torguson R, Chen F, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Apr 15; 15(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 24767313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K, Chatzizisis YS, Riga M, Giannopoulos A, Antoniadis AP, Tu S, Fujino Y, Mitsouras D, Doulaverakis C, Tsampoulatidis I, Koutkias VG, Bouki K, Li Y, Chouvarda I, Cheimariotis G, Maglaveras N, Kompatsiaris I, Nakamura S, Reiber JH, Rybicki F, Karvounis H, Stefanadis C, Tousoulis D, Giannoglou GD.
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun 15; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J, Pietrasik A, Rdzanak A, Jąkała J, Zasada W, Scibisz A, Kołtowski L, Proniewska K, Pociask E, Legutko J.
    Kardiol Pol; 2014 Jun 15; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y, Kitahara H, Tanaka S, Okada K, Kimura T, Ikeno F, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ, Honda Y.
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr 15; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
    Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Yonetsu T, Vergallo R, Kotsia A, Nakatani S, Lakkas LS, Athanasiou LS, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Feldman CL, Stone PH, Serruys PW, Jang IK, Michalis LK.
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug 15; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
    Akl E, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Mehta SR, Dan K, Kuku KO, Courtney BK, Sheth T.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb 15; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.