These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

165 related items for PubMed ID: 2341669

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Auditory brainstem responses recorded at fast stimulation rates using maximum length sequences.
    Thornton AR, Slaven A.
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Jun; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 8241969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Influence of stimulation parameters on auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia and major depression: an auditory evoked potential study.
    Adler G, Adler J, Schneck M, Armbruster B.
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1990 May; 81(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 2356768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Effect of stimulus frequency on the latency of acoustically evoked brain stem potentials in children].
    Ressler P.
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1986 Jun; 38(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 3749358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of relative starting phase and frequency separation of two-tone stimuli on the brain-stem auditory-evoked response.
    Sammeth CA, Burkard RF, Hecox KE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1405-9. PubMed ID: 1939905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The feasibility of maximum length sequences to reduce acquisition time of the middle latency response.
    Bell SL, Allen R, Lutman ME.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1073-81. PubMed ID: 11303921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. I. Peak latencies.
    Burkard R, McGee J, Walsh EJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):978-90. PubMed ID: 8759951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
    Folsom RC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects.
    Burkard R, Hecox K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1204-13. PubMed ID: 6643843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [The auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in the guinea pig].
    Olszewski J.
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1988 Oct; 134(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 3229616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Brainstem auditory evoked response recorded using maximum length sequences in term neonates.
    Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wilkinson AR.
    Biol Neonate; 1999 Oct; 76(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 10473892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A, Link A, Elster C, Burghoff M, Sander T, Trahms L, Poeppel D.
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.