These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

2090 related items for PubMed ID: 23416751

  • 1. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM, Aspell E, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R, Gustafson SJ, Hornsby BWY, Bess FH.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Apr; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1416-30. PubMed ID: 21498576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Oct; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H, Hickson L, Seeto M.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Feb; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Oct; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D, Bazo D.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Oct; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
    Wu YH, Aksan N, Rizzo M, Stangl E, Zhang X, Bentler R.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Oct; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 105.