These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


834 related items for PubMed ID: 23422730

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery?
    Adogwa O, Carr K, Fatemi P, Verla T, Gazcon G, Gottfried O, Bagley C, Cheng J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep 01; 39(19):1614-9. PubMed ID: 24921847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y.
    Spine J; 2008 Sep 01; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK, Parker SL, Adogwa O, Shau DN, Cheng J, Aaronson O, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct 01; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, Mendenhall SK, Devin CJ, Asher AL, McGirt MJ.
    Spine J; 2013 Sep 01; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
    Lambrechts MJ, Toci GR, Siegel N, Karamian BA, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK.
    Spine J; 2023 Jan 01; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A, Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Romero-Vargas S, Obil-Chavarría C, Brenes-Rojas L, Reyes-Sánchez A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan 01; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb 01; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.